Use Skype to podcast? Will you use Gmail now?

What service do you use to record audio/video for remote participants in your podcast?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We’re close to finishing the podcast studio for faculty, and I’ve long been planning to use Skype for interview/remote participant recording. However, after hearing about Google releasing video chat for Gmail (more information at Techcrunch, ReadWriteWeb, Mashable) I have to wonder – will this be the new podcast recorder of choice? Or is there something else people like using I haven’t tried yet?

Thanks for taking the poll. If you have a solution that works well for you, or if I didn’t list your solution of choice, let me know in the comments!

Rate this:
2.8

Ultimate Screencast Comparison – The Chart

This entry is part 4 of 4 in the series Ultimate Screencast Comparison

This is an evolving project. If you have suggestions or recommendations, I’d love to hear them in the comments below the post.

In order to quickly compare features, price and other items of note for the many screen recording apps available, I’ve used extjs to build a sortable chart. To sort by any column, click on a header name. Other options, like grouping, are available when clicking on the right side of a column. There are several features I’d like to add to the chart, like turning grouping off and adding a search feature, but I have to balance time between developing a nice chart and reviewing applications. Bear with me on the slow development of the chart, and let me know what you think below in the comments.

I’ll start posting reviews once the chart is complete, starting with the most popular applications. I recently explained why I’m doing this and how I’ll be reviewing the applications if you’d like more info. Based on my reviews, your comments and our faculty response, I’ll begin recommending specific applications, and somehow indicate those apps on the chart.

Several sites and articles were of invaluable help in building this list of screen recording apps, including:

Rate this:
2.8

Ultimate Screencast Comparison – The Reviews

This entry is part 3 of 4 in the series Ultimate Screencast Comparison

This is an evolving project, and I’m interested in your suggestions – feel free to leave comments below the article.

I have to admit, I have a vested interest in this project. We are in the final stages of putting together a podcasting/screencasting studio together for faculty, staff and student projects. I want to provide a tested workflow both for applications we make available in the studio and applications we recommend instructors use on their own. The intended audience (faculty members who shouldn’t be required to become technology experts) and intended purpose will drive how I evaluate the applications. In my upcoming reviews, I’ll focus on evaluating and testing several specific features and characteristics.

The Reviews.

  • Ease of use for non-geeks.
    I don’t expect faculty to become technology experts – unless they want to, of course. Too often, it seems faculty find themselves in the position of being required to use a particular technology, which drives how they develop learning objects. Powerpoint is a good example – because the technology drives the development, we end up with a glut of slides with built-in themes, bullet-point lists and printed handouts. My belief and practice is technology should be implemented the other way around – faculty, as content experts, recognize a difficulty in teaching a particular skill set or course material, and look for a solution that may involve new technology. This way, the content drives the development, not the features and limitations of the selected technology. Because faculty should be empowered to create content and learning objects without slogging through help files and manuals, technology should be as transparent and easy to use as possible.
  • Convert and use existing assets.
    Many faculty already have existing objects they’d like to build on, including Powerpoint presentations, videos and photos. The recommended screencast application should provide a bridge for faculty, allowing them to start with what’s familiar and branch out into new features.
  • One-stop shop.
    I suspect this will be a deal-breaker for many applications I test. As much as possible, I’d like the recommended application to handle as much of the entire workflow as possible. I personally use several applications together when making screencasts – for example, I record audio and video separately. For faculty, however, I believe starting with one application is the easiest route. Don’t get me wrong – I heartily support faculty who wish to delve into technology and learn more than the superficial, official method; however, I recognize there are many who are not interested or don’t have the time, and wish to make technology as accessible as possible to as wide an audience as I can. Therefore, ideally, the recommended application will record, edit and publish/encode both audio and video.
  • Multiple encoding options.
    Many faculty wish to distribute their developed objects through multiple channels – online, on a DVD, broadcast on the local educational channel and via a podcast feed, for example. The recommended screencast recorders should be able to handle publishing objects in multiple formats, accommodating as many distribution channels as possible.

The Tests.

Workflow – Record a YouTube video, a Skype interview and a Second Life session.
Screencast recorders can be used for many more things than demonstrating how to use an application. For example:

  • a Communications instructor can record a video of a speech and discuss the speaker’s communication skills
  • a math instructor can use a tablet to write math problems on the screen and incorporate them into a video
  • a Psychology instructor might record a Second Life session demonstrating a particular cultural phenomenon
  • a History instructor might create a time-lapse video of a particular Wikipedia article demonstrating how our understanding of events might evolve
  • an Art instructor might record a Skype interview with several museum curators, adding pictures or videos demonstrating the pieces discussed
  • or an English instructor might create a machinima-based presentation demonstrating the real-world applicability of grammar rules

Granted, most of these projects are fairly advanced, but they all start with a basic list of features – recording audio and recording video at a high frames-per-second rate. To test an application’s basic abilities, I’ll record a YouTube video along with my own audio commentary; to test an application’s ability to handle as many advanced uses as I can anticipate, I’ll record a short Skype interview and Second Life session.

Distribution – publish for online (.flv or .swf), podcast/mobile (.mp4), and DVD (high-quality .mov or .wmv).
After completing the above recordings using each reviewed application, I’ll publish them and compare file size and quality using the three most-anticipated distribution channels.

Have other suggested tests or features to evaluate? Let me know in the comments below.

Rate this:
3.0 (1 person)

Ultimate Screencast Comparison – The List

This entry is part 2 of 4 in the series Ultimate Screencast Comparison

This is an evolving project. If you have suggestions or recommendations, I’d love to hear them in the comments below the post.

I’m in the process of building a chart comparing features and characteristics of screencasting applications. It’s taking a while to build the chart, so I thought I’d list the apps below and begin asking people for recommendations for ones I missed. I’ve split the list up into three sections: Windows, Mac and Webapp/Other. Two notes of interest:

  • I did not include Linux apps, as none of the faculty or studio computers are currently running Linux. If I have time, I might revise the list to include Linux apps.
  • When adding applications to the list, I only picked … well, screencasting apps. This excludes programs with a lot of extra functionality, including my current favorite for building learning objects, Adobe Captivate. While apps like this do have screen recording features, they tend to be much more powerful and complicated for non-geeks. I’m sure I’ve offended someone out there, so I’ll explain what I mean in a follow-up post.

Several sites and articles were of invaluable help in finding screencasting apps, including:

In upcoming articles, I’ll explain why and how I’ll be evaluating the applications, build a chart for comparing features and describe the workflow I personally use. I also intend to publish as many reviews as I can, and publish a follow-up article identifying which applications I chose to recommend to our faculty and why.

And now, here’s the list:

Rate this:
3.1 (2 people)

CNet’s Webware Awards – Vote for your favorite Web 2.0 app

CNet’s Webware has posted a poll where users can vote for their favorite Web 2.0 apps. The apps are split into 10 categories, with 25 apps listed in each category – holy overload, Batman! While the list includes some non-Web 2.0 apps (Internet Explorer!?!? Come on….), it does include some services worth reviewing. I thought I’d start by listing the contestants by category, pick the one I think is the winner, then start reviewing some of the more interesting services. We’ll see if my picks change after taking a hard look at some services I’ve not yet joined.

Webware’s choices are split into the following categories:

Browsing
They’ve included several non-Web 2.0 apps here, including Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera. I still use Bloglines, but most of the masses seem to have moved on to Netvibes or Google Reader. LeapTag is an interesting project, StumbleUpon seems to have enjoyed a resurgence in popularity, OpenID is gaining traction (but I fail to see why it’s a Web 2.0 app), and Yahoo Pipes is a potentially revolutionary app. This is a tough one, but I’d have to pick Yahoo Pipes.

Communication
Several non-Web 2.0 apps here, along with some heavy-hitters – Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Twitter and Skype are all likely candidates in my book. While there are other interesting projects on the list, like Zimbra, Jaiku and Meebo, they don’t have the popularity of the heavy-hitters. The widget-based platforms like Netvibes and Pageflakes (where’s iGoogle, by the way?) show a lot of promise, but aren’t simple enough to attract non-techies yet. My pick – either Skype or Gmail, although that perplexingly-popular Twitter will probably win.

Community
Not so long ago, this would have been an easy category to narrow down to a short-list between MySpace, Del.icio.us and Digg. With Facebook’s recent re-launch and the resulting exodus from MySpace, that may be a serious contender as well. I’ve used DeviantArt for years and never considered it a Web 2.0 app, but I suppose it does have some of the characteristics. Bebo seems to be picking up steam, and MyBlogLog is gaining popularity after Yahoo announced some upgrades. Other recognizable services, including Ning, LinkedIn, Reddit and Netscape, don’t have the popularity to beat the top three. My pick – Digg.

Data
There’s some pretty innovative stuff here, like Swivel’s data-sharing and exploration tools, and BlinkX’s video search. Most of these services are pretty esoteric though – you’re pretty much guaranteed to be a techie if you know about them, let alone can use them. Popularity and service recognition will be a problem with most of these services – except one. Winner – Google. ’nuff said.

Entertainment
Where the hell is Joost?? It can’t be excluded due to beta status – several other included services are in beta as well. And it can’t be because it’s “not Web 2.0 because you download a client” – they included IE7 for Pete’s sake! This is a weak category – a bunch of game sites, video blogs and party planners. Really, what makes watching Major League Baseball or some dude with a hat-cam Web 2.0? Most entries are neither innovative nor useful; some, like Midomi are innovative but not really useful and others, like Upcoming are useful but not really innovative. ABC and CBS have large audiences to pimp their apps to, but I doubt most members of that TV audience know of or care about this contest. My vote would go for MyPunchBowl for combined usefulness and innovativeness, but the Kevin Rose effect will probably carry Revision 3 for the win.

Media
A lot of ground-breaking services have entered this space – it’s becoming overrun, in fact, with startups concentrating on video and photo sharing and editing. We all know about YouTube, particularly after the buzz surrounding Google’s purchase and Viacom’s lawsuit. Flickr is another popular service with recent buzz. Right behind those two in name recognition are Pandora (who recently announced deals with Sansa, Sprint and Sonos), PhotoBucket (who was recently blocked, permitted and bought by MySpace and now has a Facebook F8 app), Napster (who was insanely popular during the wild-west days of filesharing and has been trying to capitalize on that popularity ever since it turned legit) and Amazon’s UnBox service. Several entries have created apps for Facebook’s new F8 platform, including Photobucket, iLike, Mog, PikNik and Slide. For sheer name recognition, media attention, popularity, Google’s backing and features, my pick goes to YouTube.

Mobile
I have to admit, not only do I not know many of these services, I don’t care to. I recognize cell phones as the next unconquered territory, but I use mine for calls and that’s it. Besides, whatever company signs on with the iPhone will be the next big thing. I see a few interesting entries like Google’s free 411 service (it’s interesting that Jangle’s service is not included in this category), Google Maps Mobile, KushKash (a money-management app that recently received $11M private investing), TellMe (another free 411 service) and Yahoo’s OneSearch. Personally, I think any service that relies on GPS (which I suspect most cell phone users still don’t want to activate) or provides media (music, games, movies, etc) isn’t a good bet just yet – not enough people want to participate in that sort of stuff. Market penetration into this category of consumers requires something useful, practical, easy to use and not requiring a user to install an app on the phone – thus, my pick goes to TellMe.

Productivity and Commerce
Wow, here’s an open field with a lot of strong contenders. Google’s got three entries with Adwords, Calendar and Docs & Spreadsheets. eBay has two entries with eBay and PayPal. Other entries backed with gobs of name recognition and popularity include Amazon, Microsoft Office Live, , Yahoo Calendar and . Even some of the lesser-known services are heavy-hitters in their own right: Zillow and Trulia offer real estate tools and searches; Craigslist has a huge following of people looking for local job listings and classifieds; business apps SalesForce and BaseCamp (which hails from 37signals, known for Ruby on Rails and other business-centric apps); and other Docs-style apps, including Zoho, ThinkFree and EditGrid. One interesting entry has no competitor entries: Farecast, an airfare-comparison app I use quite a bit, but doesn’t have the name recognition of most other entries. This is a tough category to call, and you have to take into account the types of people who will vote for their app-of-choice – business people, for instance, aren’t likely to take the time to vote for Basecamp or Salesforce. Google and eBay may have huge followings and multiple entries, but considering none of the most popular services are advertising the contest on their sites, and taking into account the viral nature of Amazon’s community, my bet’s on Amazon.

Publishing
Is there a Google stone left unturned? Blogger, Feedburner (you did know Google bought them, right?) and Google Analytics all make the list. Adobe’s Flash and Microsoft’s Silverlight (why didn’t Adobe’s Apollo make the cut) round out the big names, and many services known to few non-bloggers (including Vox, Widgetbox, Tumblr and the infamous PayPerPost) vie for eighth place. This category, however, is all about Drupal vs Wordpress – both have large followings, are directly and indirectly advertising the poll to their users (Wordpress is advertising here) and are supported by incredibly viral and loyal communities. Backed by the Wordpress.com community, my money’s on Wordpress.

Reference
Map and local search apps get a strong showing – Ask.com (who has adopted some viral marketing lately), Google, Microsoft and Yahoo all have entries. Venerable IMDb and WebMD are present. Some recent upstarts gaining news also make an appearance, including Geni (family-tree startup by PayPal’s former COO David Sacks, gaining news and funding), Instructables (funded by Tim O’Reilly’s OATV and frequently featured on Lifehacker) and RapLeaf (a reputation tracker who made the first Facebook F8 cut). However, my bet’s on Wikipedia, who should have the recognition beyond web-heads and viral popularity to handily win this category.

Conclusion

There are some interesting entries that definitely deserve a review. It would also be interesting to see a breakdown of entries by owner and funding source – maybe I can throw one together over the next couple of days.

Who are your picks? Tell me in the comments below.

Rate this:
2.5